Scott Douglas Jacobsen: What is your opinion of Speaker Johnson being re-elected with a vote of 218 to 215?

Rick Rosner: I watched some of that. The Democrats were making a big deal out of the possibility that something else might happen, but it was inevitable.

He got elected on the first ballot. They just had to keep the voting open for about an hour or so. Initially, three Republicans voted against him. It took about an hour of persuasion and probably some promises to get two of them to flip back to Johnson.

It was never going to turn out any other way. Right now, it’s 219 Republicans to 215 Democrats in the House. So, even though the news was saying they could only afford to lose one Republican, they actually had enough of a margin. It was never going to flip any other way. If they had held the vote after Trump became president, their margin might have dropped to 216 to 215.

That might have been more interesting because three members of the House are expected to leave to work in Trump’s Cabinet. Their replacements will take some time to be seated. So, with a one-person margin, it still wouldn’t necessarily lead to Democrats or someone other than Johnson winning the Speaker of the House election.

But I believe the Republicans passed a rule requiring at least nine members to vote to hold a new Speaker election. They won’t be able to get those nine votes, even after the margin drops to one. The Republicans have the power, and they won’t give it up. Neither side would willingly relinquish power if they held it.

Can they pass any legislation with a margin of 216 to 215? Maybe not, and certainly not unless it’s bipartisan. For instance, if there’s a natural disaster in a state that both sides support, like somewhere other than California, they could pass a funding bill for an expensive disaster causing billions in damage.

Other legislation, like addressing immigration, is a possibility. Trump previously scuttled a bipartisan immigration bill because it wasn’t under his administration. Now that he’s president, a similar bill may come up, and he’ll support it. Democrats might go along with bipartisan legislation to get something done. They’re not as obstructive as Trump tends to be.

So, we’ll see what happens. The previous Congress was arguably the least effective in history. It had a slightly larger margin, but still not large enough to accomplish much. This Congress will have the smallest margin in history.

Jacobsen: Okay.

Rosner: Talk to you tomorrow. You won’t have to put up with me rambling like this. All right. Take care.

Jacobsen: You too.

Rosner: Bye.

Photo by Aaron Burden on Unsplash

Rick Rosner is an accomplished television writer with credits on shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Crank Yankers, and The Man Show. Over his career, he has earned multiple Writers Guild Award nominations, winning one, and an Emmy nomination. Rosner holds a broad academic background, graduating with the equivalent of eight majors. Based in Los Angeles, he continues to write and develop ideas, while spending time with his wife, daughter, and two dogs.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the publisher of In-Sight Publishing (ISBN: 978-1-0692343) and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Interviews (ISSN: 2369-6885). He writes for The Good Men Project, The Humanist, International Policy Digest (ISSN: 2332-9416), Basic Income Earth Network (UK Registered Charity 1177066), A Free Inquiry, and other media. He is a member in good standing of numerous media organizations.

License & Copyright

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ©Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use or duplication of material without express permission from Scott Douglas Jacobsen strictly prohibited, excerpts and links must use full credit to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with direction to the original content.