Rick Rosner is an accomplished television writer with credits on shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Crank Yankers, and The Man Show. Over his career, he has earned multiple Writers Guild Award nominations—winning one—and an Emmy nomination. Rosner holds a broad academic background, graduating with the equivalent of eight majors. Based in Los Angeles, he continues to write and develop ideas while spending time with his wife, daughter, and two dogs.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the publisher of In-Sight Publishing (ISBN: 978-1-0692343) and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Interviews (ISSN: 2369-6885). He writes for The Good Men Project, International Policy Digest (ISSN: 2332–9416), The Humanist (Print: ISSN 0018-7399; Online: ISSN 2163-3576), Basic Income Earth Network (UK Registered Charity 1177066), A Further Inquiry, and other media. He is a member in good standing of numerous media organizations.

Rick Rosner explores how anomalies at the edge of observation—like black holes—challenge the compatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity. He questions the completeness of current models, proposing a new conceptual container for information and physics itself. Without such a framework, our understanding of the universe may remain fundamentally incomplete.

Rick Rosner: Exceptions to well-established scientific theories often emerge in regions difficult to observe or explore. As anomalies accumulate, they may necessitate revising the prevailing theory—this captures Thomas Kuhn’s model of scientific revolutions and paradigm shifts.

New evidence tends to arise from inaccessible contexts, which explains why it remains undiscovered for extended periods.

Consider quantum mechanics. Our understanding fails near black holes, where extreme gravity distorts spacetime. We still lack a full account of what happens to information in such regions.

One of the major unresolved problems in physics is reconciling general relativity, which governs gravity and large-scale structures, with quantum mechanics, which describes microscopic particles. These theories remain incompatible in extreme environments such as black hole singularities.

Another conceptual challenge in quantum mechanics involves boundary conditions. Introductory models like the “particle in a box” confine a particle within an idealized potential well. The boundaries are well-defined, and the particle’s behavior is mathematically predictable.

The particle can be excited—given more energy—potentially enough to escape the well. An edge function defines the boundary and depth. This model is analytically solvable and illustrates core quantum principles, but it is highly simplified.

While I am not a quantum physicist, I suspect the current formulation of quantum mechanics—though effective—is incomplete. It often relies on assumptions that may not reflect reality’s underlying nature.

We may be missing a unifying framework: a broader conceptual or informational container that encompasses both quantum mechanics and general relativity.

This container might also define the context for information itself. We take such a framework for granted, much like the rules of a game.

In blackjack, for example, information consists of known cards—your hand and the dealer’s visible card. The context—the rules—is clear and mutually agreed upon.

But in the universe, the “game” we play with information lacks obvious rules. We might say, “the universe is made of information,” but in what context does that information exist? And what do we mean by “information” at a fundamental level?

It seems plausible that subatomic interactions—such as those between protons and electrons in a star—do not constitute “information” in a meaningful sense unless they produce observable or lasting changes. Without a lasting imprint or transfer, such interactions may not qualify as information from an informational physics perspective.

Photo by Dynamic Wang on Unsplash

Last updated May 3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices. In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarks, performances, databases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.