July 11, 2021
[Beginning of recorded material]
Scott Douglas Jacobsen: All right, so let’s discuss the topic we left off from the last session, which pertains to the proliferation of good and bad ideas. Rosner, what are your further thoughts on this?
Rick Rosner: Well, building upon what I mentioned last time, the situation in America, and perhaps in other parts of the world, is such that people who embrace bad ideas, particularly those propagated by conservative media, have been influenced for many decades. As a result, the number of individuals identifying as Republicans has been gradually declining, though not drastically. In the most recent party affiliation survey, America had 24 percent Republicans, 30 percent Democrats, and 44 percent independents. The remaining percentage was unspecified. This significant decrease applies to both Democrats and Republicans, but the decline is more pronounced among Republicans. However, there remains a stubborn group of people who are susceptible to falling for anything. They have been consistently exposed to Republican material, which consists of flawed and deceptive information, for decades. These individuals represent the remaining core believers. At this point, they are predisposed to accept anything they hear from their preferred sources, including Fox News, as well as increasingly conservative news channels like OAN and Newsmax. They also rely on various websites such as Breitbart and others. Regardless of the circumstances, there are conservative pundits who will come up with explanations, no matter how far-fetched, that align with their worldview. Consequently, they have become detached from accountability and the need for their beliefs to align with reality.
Moving on, bad ideas require a network of individuals who support and reinforce them, despite the resistance of reality. It is advantageous to have millions of people who have been preconditioned to be receptive to bad ideas. This is the current state of affairs, as demonstrated by the four-year experiment with Trump, which revealed him to be a detrimental figure for the country. Under Trump’s leadership, the number of unemployed individuals reached unprecedented levels, and due to COVID, the death toll surpassed that of any previous presidency. Many of these deaths can be attributed to COVID, accounting for 40 percent of the excess deaths, along with increased population and a 30 percent rise in opioid overdoses. Despite Trump’s promise to address the opioid crisis, he failed to take any significant action. The only notable achievement was the tax cut for the wealthy. Moreover, there hasn’t been a successful infrastructure bill since December 2015, which was passed during Obama’s presidency. Trump’s tenure was marked by a lack of accomplishments, evident to everyone except his loyal supporters.
You asked me about distinguishing between a good idea and a bad idea in general. Recently, I have been listening to comedy routines on Sirius radio, where they have several comedy channels. A good joke routine relies on astute observations and reflects sound thinking. Just because it is humorous doesn’t mean it lacks intellectual merit. A comedian takes a keen observation and supports it with personal anecdotes to reinforce their comedic thesis. Therefore, there are certain elements that contribute to a good idea, such as familiarity. By using familiar elements that people are aware of, one can introduce novel and interesting ideas. Not everything in a good idea needs to be familiar; it can combine familiar aspects with new ones. However, maintaining a connection with people’s experiences and aligning with their understanding of the world is crucial for a good idea. Conversely, bad ideas often present falsehoods, distort facts, and deviate from what people know and comprehend. They tend to be overly complicated and require a reliance on hidden information. Essentially, the bad ideas people consume from conservative media often involve conspiracies and discourage individuals from trusting their direct experience of the world. Instead, they are presented with alternative narratives for which there is no evidence, and they are expected to accept them without question.
In conclusion, I could delve further into the topic of differentiating between good and bad ideas, but for now, let’s conclude this session.
[End of recorded material]
Authors[1]
American Television Writer
(Updated July 25, 2019)
*High range testing (HRT) should be taken with honest skepticism grounded in the limited empirical development of the field at present, even in spite of honest and sincere efforts. If a higher general intelligence score, then the greater the variability in, and margin of error in, the general intelligence scores because of the greater rarity in the population.*
According to some semi-reputable sources gathered in a listing here, Rick G. Rosner may have among America’s, North America’s, and the world’s highest measured IQs at or above 190 (S.D. 15)/196 (S.D. 16) based on several high range test performances created by Christopher Harding, Jason Betts, Paul Cooijmans, and Ronald Hoeflin. He earned 12 years of college credit in less than a year and graduated with the equivalent of 8 majors. He has received 8 Writers Guild Awards and Emmy nominations, and was titled 2013 North American Genius of the Year by The World Genius Directory with the main “Genius” listing here.
He has written for Remote Control, Crank Yankers, The Man Show, The Emmys, The Grammys, and Jimmy Kimmel Live!. He worked as a bouncer, a nude art model, a roller-skating waiter, and a stripper. In a television commercial, Domino’s Pizza named him the “World’s Smartest Man.” The commercial was taken off the air after Subway sandwiches issued a cease-and-desist. He was named “Best Bouncer” in the Denver Area, Colorado, by Westwood Magazine.
Rosner spent much of the late Disco Era as an undercover high school student. In addition, he spent 25 years as a bar bouncer and American fake ID-catcher, and 25+ years as a stripper, and nearly 30 years as a writer for more than 2,500 hours of network television. Errol Morris featured Rosner in the interview series entitled First Person, where some of this history was covered by Morris. He came in second, or lost, on Jeopardy!, sued Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? over a flawed question and lost the lawsuit. He won one game and lost one game on Are You Smarter Than a Drunk Person? (He was drunk). Finally, he spent 37+ years working on a time-invariant variation of the Big Bang Theory.
Currently, Rosner sits tweeting in a bathrobe (winter) or a towel (summer). He lives in Los Angeles, California with his wife, dog, and goldfish. He and his wife have a daughter. You can send him money or questions at LanceVersusRick@Gmail.Com, or a direct message via Twitter, or find him on LinkedIn, or see him on YouTube.
Scott Douglas Jacobsen
Founder, In-Sight Publishing
Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the Founder of In-Sight Publishing and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal (ISSN 2369-6885). Jacobsen works for science and human rights, especially women’s and children’s rights. He considers the modern scientific and technological world the foundation for the provision of the basics of human life throughout the world and the advancement of human rights as the universal movement among peoples everywhere.
Footnotes
[1] Four format points for the session article:
- Bold text following “Scott Douglas Jacobsen:” or “Jacobsen:” is Scott Douglas Jacobsen & non-bold text following “Rick Rosner:” or “Rosner:” is Rick Rosner.
- Session article conducted, transcribed, edited, formatted, and published by Scott.
- Footnotes & in-text citations in the interview & references after the interview.
- This session article has been edited for clarity and readability.
For further information on the formatting guidelines incorporated into this document, please see the following documents:
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Citation Guide: APA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.sfu.ca/system/files/28281/APA6CitationGuideSFUv3.pdf.
- Humble, A. (n.d.). Guide to Transcribing. Retrieved from http://www.msvu.ca/site/media/msvu/Transcription%20Guide.pdf.
License and Copyright
License
In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightjournal.com and www.rickrosner.org.
Copyright
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing 2012-2020. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Rick Rosner 