Ask A Genius 1254: Trump’s First Stint

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: How do you feel about Trump’s first stint in office?

Rick Rosner: Trump is, as usual, making much noise. He’s taking harmful actions—although, on rare occasions, one might argue that not everything he does is disastrous. What I find most disconcerting about his first week in office (roughly six days) is that the initial surveys of his approval and disapproval ratings show marked improvement. Since he first announced his candidacy in 2015, he has consistently had more disapprovals than approvals—he was essentially “underwater.” Yet now, in this first week as president, several surveys (seven or eight in total, with only one conducted by a Republican organization) indicate that his approval ratings are between 6 and 17 points higher than his disapproval ratings. In one survey, for example, he scored 53% approval versus 39% disapproval—a 14-point margin.

I hope this trend doesn’t continue because it suggests that a significant portion of the population has become acclimated to, and even supportive of, his misconduct. When inaugurated in 2017, he was only marginally above water for a few days before quickly reverting to a state of overall disapproval. I still remember him falsely claiming—while boasting about it—that his inaugural crowd in Washington, D.C., was larger than Obama’s, a claim refuted by the photographic evidence.

That whole episode set the tone for people to disapprove of him—he was lying about things that everyone could see. Now, he’s acting in essentially the same way. When he was running for president, he promised to bring down the price of eggs and to resolve the war in Ukraine within 24 hours. Neither promise has come true; egg prices are at an all-time high, and he’s already backtracked on his position regarding Ukraine. Despite these failures, his approval ratings remain surprisingly strong. That’s worrisome because it encourages people to accept his shortcomings—as if to say, “let the baby have his bottle.” For example, Pete Hejseth, a blatantly unfit nominee for Secretary of Defense, was confirmed by a 50–50 Senate vote, with the Vice President having to cast the tie-breaking vote. Similarly, Christy Ngo, an obviously unfit head of Homeland Security nominee, was confirmed by a vote of 59 to 34. This outcome suggests that some Democrats are willing to allow terrible nominees. I hope people continue to hold him accountable and disapprove of actions that warrant criticism.

Photo by Suzy Brooks on Unsplash

Rick Rosner is an accomplished television writer with credits on shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live!Crank Yankers, and The Man Show. Over his career, he has earned multiple Writers Guild Award nominations—winning one—and an Emmy nomination. Rosner holds a broad academic background, graduating with the equivalent of eight majors. Based in Los Angeles, he continues to write and develop ideas while spending time with his wife, daughter, and two dogs.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the publisher of In-Sight Publishing (ISBN: 978-1-0692343) and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Interviews (ISSN: 2369-6885). He writes for The Good Men ProjectThe HumanistInternational Policy Digest (ISSN: 2332-9416), Basic Income Earth Network (UK Registered Charity 1177066), A Free Inquiry, and other media. He is a member in good standing of numerous media organizations.

License & Copyright

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ©Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use or duplication of material without express permission from Scott Douglas Jacobsen strictly prohibited, excerpts and links must use full credit to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with direction to the original content.

Leave a comment