Ask A Genius 383 – Cudgels of Stupidity

In-Sight Publishing

Ask A Genius 383 – Cudgels of Stupidity

September 15, 2018

[Beginning of recorded material]

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: What happens when power enters the wrong hands?

Rick Rosner: Cudgels of stupidity that end up in the wrong hands, end up in the hands of people with no morality.

Jacobsen: If we look at the lies of Trump, they continually catch up with him, in some manner. It doesn’t amount to any strict action. However, it does catch up. People lose respect for him, see through him.

Rosner: If you look at his popularity ratings, they started at 50% because people were willing to give him a chance, but then they slowly sagged into the mid-30s and often for the high 30s. Now, they crept into the 40s.

Because people have had a year and a half to consider Trump. They figure: if they like his agenda, then they can deal with the terrible crap that he does. The conservatives are much louder in shouting their conspiracy theories and in what they think is good about Trump.

People who think Trump is terrible to outnumber those who think he is okay. But there is not a concerted effort on the non-conservative media to contextualize Trump to make people understand in a yelly way – the way the conservatives do – to make people who hate Trump to structure it.

It is structuring it so we understand why he’s terrible. But we have a harder time than the conservatives in making the leap from him being terrible on a personal level to why it is terrible for the country.

Conservatives can tell you Obama was terrible for the country. They can tell you Trump is great for the country. I don’t think non-conservatives have that much-structured argument. We know things suck.

But we do not have as much clarity as the conservatives, which is a bad thing.

Jacobsen: It comes out in who farther right conservative Republicans direct their vitriol at or heaviest critique. The heaviest critique does not lie with the Democratic Party. 

It lies with Islamic terrorists. That form and minority of Islam is Islamist, and so a political form of it. If I reflect on what they point to, they could point the finger back. In their own party, they have Dominionists and Reconstructionists.

Rosner: Every time, or often, I go to work with Lance. When I walk in, he’s got a podcast going. Some conservative guy is yelling at him, just yelling and making some complicated for why everything is a Deep State conspiracy against brave conservative figureheads like Trump.

Then it is making those arguments at the top of their lungs. Liberals do not have people yelling like that. We have people being reasonable. I am not sure the reasonable people helping people coming to their own conclusions is as effective as the yelly conservative guys on the other side.

Jacobsen: That leads to a question, “Do most Americans seem equipped to think critically and rationally about issues facing them in the modern world, at least in their own country?”

Rosner: Yes, most do. But there is a segment of people – a big thick segment – who don’t have the time, interest, or, in some cases, the wherewithal to think critically. Not everyone wants to watch three hours of political news a day.

They want stuff digested for them. For those people, there are conservative media providing powerful, simple arguments for them. I do not see powerful arguments being presented as much on the liberal side.

The liberal side is more do-it-yourself. Here is the news. Here is what’s going on. You guys build a worldview based on the news we’re bringing to you. But I would think a segment of the population would be okay being yelled at from a non-conservative point of view, and being persuaded by the yelling and the simple, powerful arguments.

I think people susceptible to simple, powerful arguments are not just Trump people, except Trump and conservatives are the ones making the loud, powerful, simple arguments.

[End of recorded material]


Rick Rosner

American Television Writer


Rick Rosner

Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Editor-in-Chief, In-Sight Publishing


In-Sight Publishing


[1] Four format points for the session article:

  1. Bold text following “Scott Douglas Jacobsen:” or “Jacobsen:” is Scott Douglas Jacobsen & non-bold text following “Rick Rosner:” or “Rosner:” is Rick Rosner.
  2. Session article conducted, transcribed, edited, formatted, and published by Scott.
  3. Footnotes & in-text citations in the interview & references after the interview.
  4. This session article has been edited for clarity and readability.

For further information on the formatting guidelines incorporated into this document, please see the following documents:

  1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Citation Guide: APA. Retrieved from
  2. Humble, A. (n.d.). Guide to Transcribing. Retrieved from

License and Copyright

In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at and


© Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 2012-2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s